Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Bad (for women and) Teacher(s)

Columbia Pictures' Bad Teacher will be released on June 24th, starring Cameron Diaz and Justin Timberlake. I have been disgusted with this movie from the first time I saw the trailer. It's not that didn't know that much of what Hollywood grinds out isn't always favorable to women or minorities, but this seems like a new low.

For those of you unfamiliar with the plot here it is, according to the trailer and reviews: Cameron Diaz plays a foul-mouthed, hard-partying woman who has been dumped by her rich fiance, and has to (gasp!) work for a living as a 7th grade teacher. She can't have that, so she makes it a goal to find someone to take care of her, and sets her sights on one of her colleagues (Justin Timberlake). For whatever reason, she gets it in her head that in order to land him, she has to get breast implants, which makes her actually get involved with her students, because there is some test-taking contest that involves prize money which she needs so she can get implants. Whew. So, a teacher hates her job and wants to marry a rich guy, and thinks she needs breast implants to do it. And in case you were wondering, yes, there is a car wash scene.

I'm flabbergasted. How can this be funny?Let's list off the awful ideas and stereotypes that this movie promotes:

1. Women should depend on men to financially support them.
2. It's okay for women to feel like they have to cosmetically alter their bodies in order to attract men.
3. Men are dumb and superficial and only notice and like a girl if she has big breasts.
4. I don't know what to say about how they treat teachers--that being a teacher is overall an uncool, sucky job? And that it's so easy, even an awful, unqualified person like Diaz's character could do it? Which is not at all cool, given the very real issues teachers are facing now, and how hard it is to get a job as a teacher.

I don't know how the movie ends. I will have to rely on someone else to tell me, because I refuse to spend money on this film. If I had to take a stab, I'd say that it has a warm, happy ending, in which the selfish, superficial teacher gets some sort of mild comeuppance and learns that maybe being a teacher isn't so bad, and that she can find someone who appreciates her--small breasts and all. Probably the Jason Segel character, 'cause in the preview he asks her to hold his ball sack, and she asks him to sign her yearbook. If that isn't mature, grown-up love, I don't know what is.

I don't think it matters how the movie ends, though. The fact is that Hollywood is once again finding ways to harm women and (try) to make it funny. I think that Hollywood has taken many, many steps backward in the past decade or two concerning women in film. What powerful roles have women been given lately? Most of the examples of "powerful" women are sexy women doing guy things. That's not empowering--that's just sexy women doing guy things. Movies like Sucker Punch and the Transformers franchise create an absurd image of women that doesn't exist in the real world. That isn't to say that there aren't girls who are into kicking ass and fixing cars--but the majority of those women aren't also into copious amounts of lip gloss and wearing push-up bras. (Actually, I don't know any woman who is "into" wearing push-up bras. Those things are crazy uncomfortable).

So the kind of women that are in many Hollywood blockbusters today are just decorative. They often don't add much to the story except sex appeal. This makes things difficult for real women who are actually people and have their own interests separate from what men like to do--or what men like to watch women do. That is not to say that there is anything wrong with men's interests; it just isn't fair to push them on women as the epitome of sexy and empowering. Because it isn't.

Bad Teacher is bad for women on a whole other level. Not only is Diaz's character unrealistic, but she is blatantly counter to what strong women believe in--that we are capable and therefore deserve to be equal in the workplace, and that we should be proud of our bodies. Our natural bodies. For some reason, this doesn't seem to be raising red flags for many people, but that's probably because we're so used to seeing Hollywood stick out its foot to trip feminism so often. And, obviously, it works. Because they keep doing it, and people keep lining up to see it.

Of course, there is one glaring exception to my "Modern Hollywood Sucks" bitchfest, and that's Bridesmaids. I've read some feminist criticism of Bridesmaids, which essentially complains that the first big female-powered comedy is about what? Yeah, marriage. Maybe, but isn't that what The Hangover movies are about? Pre-wedding craziness. Bridesmaids does the same thing, but from a female perspective, and it's hilarious to both men and women. I'm absolutely ecstatic that Bridesmaids has done so well, because that means that there is a market for that kind of movie. And where there is a market, there will be product.

I will not go see Bad Teacher, because I refuse to be a part of what encourages production companies to keep making these sort of mindless films. If you would like to see films that are actually empowering to women rather than making women sexy joke fodder, go see something like Bridesmaids instead.

5 comments:

  1. 3. Men are dumb and superficial and only notice and like a girl if she has big breasts.

    I'm going to have to mostly agree with this. There are exceptions, of course. Like...gay men, for instance. But even they like a pair of big boobs once in a while.

    I take pretty much everything Hollywood, TV, and the music industry vomits out with a grain of salt. Are there *any* movies out there that don't include a stereotypical character of a certain race/gender/sex/whatever anymore? I'm not gonna lie -- sometimes I just want to watch a movie that objectifies dudes as sex objects :D

    ReplyDelete
  2. You've made some good points, certainly. I happen to agree with Kristen though. Holly produces material to appeal to the lowest common denominator. Frankly, most of America finds it hilarious, riveting, exciting, etc. Is it stupid? Yes. Do the writers/directors/producers have the responsibility to weigh this fact before they make a picture? Hell no.

    Simply put movies, TV, apps, video games, etc... it's all business. For good or bad, it's money that drives this crap to the cineplex. And while people continue to buy tickets to the crap, crap will continue to be made.

    But that being said, it's cool bloggers like you who post thoughts like this that hopefully steer a few of us mindless sheep away from the multiplex (or at least to a less hurtful film).

    Bad Teacher just looks like a by the number rom-com, where a generally bitchy woman learns a few life lessons. It's worthless, and hopefully it'll tank.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Firstly, to Kristin, that's incredibly sexist. It's a gross oversimplification of the male psyche to make such claims. But you didn't stop there! Why not claim gay men really love breasts too?

    Also, and again I'm sorry, but some men are gay. Those men are not attracted to you.

    The solution to sexism isn't sexism. That's mere perpetuation of the problem. It reinforces the problem it claims to solve.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it's a bit true, but I don't think its just men who notice big breasts. I've heard countless women remark upon someone who obviously has had work done. But larger things are generally more likely to draw your eye, so I hardly think you can fault anyone if their eyes travel to something that would perhaps be larger than normal.

    I personally am attracted to a pretty face first-- after that, if they're not actually intelligent and capable of having a substantial conversation beyond "How about this heat, crazy isn't it?" the attraction is no longer there. For me, and I think for most men with IQs above 100, physical attractiveness is almost because of a REAL connection. I think if you have a real connection someone, you will think they're beautiful nonetheless. God knows I'd never have gotten married if it were my looks alone as criteria for someone being attracted to me.

    I'm not actually planning on seeing either one of these movies; I agree entirely about the movie Bad Teacher being a terribly anti-woman movie, but I hate Cameron Diaz to begin with. I don't really want to see Bridesmaids either, though, because I just don't like potty humor. The scene in the trailer in which they're all trying on dresses only to find that they have food poisoning is enough to discourage me; it's just not my kind of humor. Also, I think it is a good comparison to "The Hangover," which I saw and thought was actually not very funny at all-- Zach Galifinakis (sp?) is really the only funny part about that movie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kristen, fantastic example of double standards. How is using the stereotype of men only noticing girls with big breasts any different from the stereotypes you consider to be vomit when they pertain to women?

    Gays like a pair of big breasts every once in a while? You've got to be kidding me! What a ridiculous thing to say. No more than you do, maybe less.

    As for the movie, I have no intentions of seeing it but I would suggest doing so before making any assumptions about it. It received terrible reviews (no surprise there), but without knowing the ending or theme it's impossible to say anything for sure.

    If it ends as you expect (and I think you're probably right) that she falls in the love with the average looking man who loves her for who she is and she realizes that she enjoys teaching... is that such a bad moral? It's not like the vast majority of women don't already know all that, but it would do some damage control.

    ReplyDelete